How the Sub-Plot Mirrors the Main Plot in King Lear by...

How the Sub-Plot Mirrors the Main Plot in King Lear by William Shakespeare One can say that the sub plot does mirror the main plot to some extent. Some are in subtle ways and some are in the more obvious ways. Shakespeare has two plots in order to intensify the main theme of tragedy that runs throughout this play. The main plot is in which King Lear is the tragic hero however it is clear that just by misfortune he is deprived of something very valuable to him by error of judgment and this is immediately highlighted in the first scene of Act one where he goes through a rapid transition of loving to hating his only truly loyal daughter Cordelia. Disowning her because she refuses to exaggerate her†¦show more content†¦Although in King Lear the two tragic characters, a king and an earl, are not ordinary men. To have a man who is conspicuous and endures suffering brought about because of his own error is striking. The fear aroused for this man is of great importance because of his exalted position. His fall is awesome and overwhelming. This also appl ies in ‘Othello’, where the high position of Othello is such that his fall is to a catastrophic level and highlights the tragedy. When tragedy, as in ‘King Lear’, happens to two such men, the effect is even greater. Although some of Lear’s actions and decisions are very flawed, they are not occasioned by any corruption or depravity in him, but by an error in judgement, which, however, does arise from a defect of character. Lear has a tragic flaw, which is indeed egotism. It is his egotism in the first scene that causes him to make his error in judgment - the division of his kingdom and the loss of Cordelia. Throughout the rest of the play, the consequences of this error slowly and steadfastly increase until Lear is destroyed. Therefore although egotism is a big part of his character, that does not prevent the audience from understanding the tragedy that falls on him. This is because for us as the audience to identify tragedy with him, we must feel th at what happens to him could happen to us. IfShow MoreRelatedReligion in Shakespeare1024 Words   |  4 PagesThe religion of William Shakespeare is a subject about which very few people have a complete understanding. His plays and poems contain an almost overwhelming number of biblical references and allusions to biblical thinking, which can be seen as either Protestant or Catholic in understanding. His concealment of various understandings and interpretations of religious ideology make it difficult to ascertain his own religious beliefs, however, through further analysis of [insert names of plays], onceRead MoreEssay about Shakespeares Twelfth Night1780 Words   |  8 Pages Shakespeares Twelfth Night A study of William Shakespeares Twelfth Night, showing how Shakespeares choice of form, structure and language shape meaning Wit, andt be thy will, put me into good fooling! Those wits that think they have thee do very oft prove fools; and I that am sure I lack thee may pass for a wise man. For what says Quinapalus? Better a witty fool than a foolish wit. Shakespeares plays were written to be performed to an audience from different social classes and

Money Vs. Happiness Is It Possible For Money - 942 Words

Money vs. Happiness Is it possible for money to buy happiness in life? Is work worth every second that you cannot spend with family? People in today’s world must either make a choice between the two, money or happiness, or find a happy medium. Should lives be wasted on material items when there is much more to life, such as faith, love, family, and health? Faith brings people security and hope for the future, allowing happiness into people’s lives. â€Å"Faith takes strength, and it makes strength.† (Taylor 1) Whether it be religious or not, faith leads to happiness rather than money. Money can be lost, stole, or may go down in value; whereas faith is everlasting and can never be physically stolen. Once people find peace and hope in their heart they can love themselves. Once people love themselves, they can love another. Love is the feeling of acceptance, knowing there is someone there for every event throughout life, but individuals must be able to show love wi thout a constant worry of money. In today’s world as Dakin, John and Wampler said, â€Å"†¦disagreements over ï ¬ nances rank among the top reasons contributing to divorce† (Dakin, John, and Wampler 1) Godwin states that â€Å"Couples who argue about money are really arguing about how to manage the money they have.† (Godwin 1) Sometimes finances take over a relationship. But when people love each other, they love them through thick and thin. Individuals have to give another there time, and space. Putting money aside and focusingShow MoreRelatedUtilitarianism And Its Effect On Society1257 Words   |  6 PagesUtilitarianism Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is â€Å"actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure.† (CW, X.210) (Heydt). There are several varieties of utilitarianism. â€Å"Basically, a utilitarian approach to morality implies that no moral act (an act of stealing) or rule (â€Å"Keep your promises†)Read MoreEconomic Systems: Socialism and Capitalism Essay1018 Words   |  5 PagesI have observed that when Americans discuss the relative merits of socialism vs. capitalism, the chief debates that come up are †¢ What would happen if we remove the stimulus for innovation and productivity that a free market generates? This implies having a free market including individual ownership and control, and to varying degrees a laissez-faire government. †¢ Would it be possible to have a thriving society in which we would not have 20% of the population living in poverty and without adequateRead MoreIntroduction The purpose of this paper is to examine an ethical dilemma faced by a company who1600 Words   |  7 Pagespresent factors that influence the transistor company’s business decision. Finally, the Utility Test and Common Good Test will be applied to the company’s predicament to help determine the correct ethical course of action for this situation. Liability vs. Responsibility In 1975, a company that manufactured transistors faced an important business and ethical dilemma. The company had a contract to produce transistors for a company that specialized in manufacturing pacemakers. A pacemaker is a small deviceRead MoreThe Connection Between Self Esteem And Income1690 Words   |  7 Pagesthere is any relationship between the amount of money a person has and their level of happiness. Whilst many researchers have directly investigated such a link, most have found little-to-no correlation (Quoidbach, Dunn, Petrides Mikolajczak, 2010; Devoe Pfeffer, 2009). However, a less discussed relationship is that between a person’s self-esteem and their income levels. As it has been found that self-esteem is strongly linked to a person’s happiness (Baumeister, Campbell, Krueger Vohs, 2003; SwannRead MoreThe American Dream Essay755 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"Every person has the opportunity to achieve their own idea of happiness.† Which version is your version? Or maybe your version is different. Have you thought about what different versions of the American Dream might do? What if one version, stressed homeownership? Well, it might move people to buy houses. Like the housing bust of 2016-7. That wasn’t good. Or what about the materialistic American Dream? People start spending more money on materialistic goods, and they start taking out loans, thenRead MoreShould Retirement Be Discontinued? Why Or Why? Essay791 Words   |  4 Pagesa reduction by $1 for each $2 over the stated amount. The age to retire, in my opinion is an individual’s decision one must make based on his or her ability to maintain the same standard of living that he or she is accustomed to. If this is not possible then the alternative is to delay retirement and in so doing will get the increase income from Social Security. The issue of one’s heath or lack of it is another factor in determining retirement, and this often carried more weight in the processRead MoreEgoism vs Altruism884 Words   |  4 Pages2013SP-PHIL-202-006W Egoism vs. Altruism The current political atmosphere has brought about a renewal in the interest of the works of Ayn Rand. The Russian-American novelist has once again been thrust into the limelight for a new generation of readers and political thinkers. Her ideas have been lauded in the Wall Street Journal and Fox News, and like many things these days, has had her ideas bent to meet certain political agendas. Much like Lenin used the ideas of Marx and Engels, the politicalRead MoreTo What Extent Does Genetic Inheritance Influence Behavior?974 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"To what extent does genetic inheritance influence behavior?† A debate of nature vs. nurture, as in whether it is our inherited genes or environmental factors that affect our behavior, has been going on for years. There are no true experiments on genetic inheritance influencing behavior due to ethical reasons. Only quasi-experiments and theories of pre-existing data are available that are on genetics or environmental factors affecting behavior. With the few studies existing one can still argueRead MoreNikola Tesla Giant Of Electricity1510 Words   |  7 Pagesimagination beyond its wildest dreams. Nikola Tesla Giant of Electricity is a book about an inventor, mathematician, engineer, physicist, and most importantly a discoverer! This book tells about the hardships of the great Nikola Tesla’s life and his happiness and struggles as he works to introduce his amazing inventions to the public’s life. I really enjoyed the book, Nikola Tesla Giant of Electricity, because it tells the story of a great discoverer and intelligent man that overcame many hardships, andRead MoreThe Great Gatsby and Death of a Salesman913 Words   |  4 Pagestangible and intangible objects. The american dream came from the early settlers in America who were striving to achieve equality and opportunities for everyone. The american dream appealed to everyone because it was possible for everyone to achieve. It wasnt all about how much money a person could achieve, but more about how everyone had the ability to achieve it. The american dream is still trying to be achieved today and is an ongoing process that many people are working hard to attain. The advertisements

Your Title Goes Here Free Essays

The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after editorial cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad were published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on September 30, 2005. Danish Muslim organizations staged protests in response. As the controversy has grown, some or all of the cartoons have been reprinted in newspapers in more than fifty other countries, leading to violent protests involving hundreds of deaths, particularly in Muslim countries. We will write a custom essay sample on Your Title Goes Here or any similar topic only for you Order Now I feel this is a suitable story to explore and analyze media bias and prejudiced reporting, as this is a highly controversial issue between a Muslim population sensitive over what they perceive as a global assault by the Western world on their religion and faith, and both liberals and right wingers alike who feel that freedom of speech is sacred and unassailable. As such, I have included news coverage from 3 distinct sources – Al-Jazeera, commonly regarded as the media champion of the Arab world; BBC, one of the oldest and respected media institutions in the world; and finally, a random daily newspaper from the United States, to compare the news coverage regarding this controversial issue, and to identify any media bias, negative reporting or partisan reporting. Al- Jazeera The link to the story can be found in the â€Å"Works Cited† section of this paper. We would expect from a preliminary basis that Al-Jazeera would typically play up the offensive nature of the cartoons, highlight the perceived insensitivities and double standards of the Western media vis-à  -vis the cartoons and the Holocaust, as well as champion the rights of the Muslim world. Surprisingly, this is not the case. The news article quoted seemed to be factual rather than opinionated in nature, quoting a variety of sources and viewpoints from both sides of the fence, from the Danish media and politicians to Hamas and other Islamic militant groups. No underlying or latent propaganda was detected; indeed, negative quotes were enclosed in double quotes, and attributed to its source. The language used was non-inflammatory, focused on facts and events, and there was no strong hint of an opinion piece. The closest the Al-Jazeera piece came to being biased was when it was reporting on the nature of the cartoons (drawings) at the heart of the controversy. The descriptions used were accurate, non-misleading, and mildly strong. However, there was no mention of the Western world point of view, or of the fact that the combined cartoons at the heart of the controversy which were spread by Danish imams contained 3 additional (highly offensive) drawings not published by the Jyllands-Posten. I conclude that the Al-Jazeera piece, when factual in nature and non-inflammatory, seems more interested in presenting the reaction of the Muslim world as well as the threats made by them, when ignoring the Western point of view. There seemed to be an unusual emphasis on the negative incidents such as attacks and boycotts that has occurred as a result of the backlash against the cartoons. BBC The report by the BBC is by far the most accurate and objective. It presents inconsistencies on the actions and words on both parties (the Danish media and the Danish imams who incited the controversy), reporting in detail how an editor of the Jyllands-Posten rejected cartoons of Jesus Christ with the reason that they would offend. Impressively, the particular section also included (in brackets) a update in which a reader pointed out that the paper did publish a cartoon of the biblical Joseph in 2000, and thus queries why the paper should be criticized over the rejection of the Jesus Christ cartoons, finally ending with the editor’s (of the BBC report) explanation of why the inconsistency was still valid. A detailed account of how the initial cartoons failed to spark any major outrage, until a group of Danish imams made concentrated efforts to spark a controversy by adding 3 cartoons which were highly offensive and insulting (more so that the original cartoons) and were not published by the Jyllands-Posten to a portfolio and touring various Middle Eastern Arab leaders with them follows. The report finally ends with a reflection of the viewpoints and the reaction of both sides. I was very impressed with the objectivity of the reports, and the lengths to which the writer went to portray the inconsistencies of both parties. Washington Post The report by the Washington Post is reminiscent of that by Al-Jazeera; non-inflammatory, factual in nature, no underlying propaganda or strong language, and drawing from a wide variety of sources. However, whereas Al-Jazeera’s report focused solely on the reaction of the Muslim world, Washington Post report carried a fair balance of the reactions of both the Western world and the Muslim world. There was a balance in the strength of the opinions and announcements from both side, and hence I find the Washington Post more balanced and objective, although the BBC outshines the Washington Post in this aspect. Works Cited Reynolds, Paul. Cartoons: Divisions and inconsistencies.   BBC. Monday 13th February 2006 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4708216.stm Fury Grows Over Denmark Cartoons. Al-Jazeera.net. Tuesday 31st January 2006. Sullivan, Kevin. Muslims’ Fury Rages Unabated Over Cartoons. The Washington Post. Saturday 11th February, 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/10/AR2006021001822.html ; How to cite Your Title Goes Here, Essay examples

Business Law English Law of Contract

Question: Describe about the Business Law for English Law of Contract. Answer: Issue In the first situation, Steve has hired the truck that is capable of loading 12 tons but when tom had loaded 10 tonnes, the suspension of truck collapsed. Is it a negligent misrepresentation? In the second situation, Pamela often watered the plants in Steve's garden. In return of it, when she asked for Steves help, he has agreed to lend his car. On the fix date, when Pamela came to collect the car Steve has refused to lend his car by saying that he has already hired his car to another customer. After this issue Pamela broke the contract. Is it the case of past consideration? Third Situation describes that Danny and Steve were both agreed on similar contract. But both of them were unaware about the accident of vehicle for which they have contracted. Later, Danny has refused to take another car. Is it the case of Common Mistake? Fourth situation illustrates that accidently Steve has sent the form innocently to Trisha. But it has led an agreement that is resulted into loss of thousands of rupees to Trisha. Is it the case of Doctrine of Estoppels? Law Law for first situation: Misrepresentation contains act in which false information is provided by one party to another party who were going to enter into a contract. In such contracts, other party believes that the person who is representing about the information is doing things in good faith. There are three types of Misrepresentation: Fraudulent Misrepresentation: The fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one party represent about any information with the intention to deceive them. The party who is providing the information should be known about the fact that it is false. Negligent Misrepresentation: Such kind of misrepresentation occurs when defendant represent about information carelessly that have no reasonable ground to believe that it is true. Innocent Misrepresentation: In such situation, another party remains innocent. It occurs in a situation when represent or has reasonable grounds for believing that the false statement is true. The situation of Negligent Misrepresentation arises when one party who is representing were innocent and dont know that whatever they would be representing is correct or not. They also did not take any responsibility for finding the truth of the fact(Lexisnexis, 2016). This case is the representation of negligent mistake. As per the Australian Consumer Law, the person who was engaged in misrepresentative negligent conduct has the liability towards damages of Tom. Tom can rescind the contract and can claim for the amount of loss as in case of Sons of Gwalia Ltd v Margaretic (2007) 232 ALR 232. Therefore, the party who has suffered through such contracts can rescind the contract. The only difference exist between fraudulent misrepresentation is that it requires reckless disregard while in negligent misrepresentation there is no reasonable ground for assuming that the fact is true(Gergen, 2013, pp. 966-969). Law for second situation: Consideration is the price or amount that is paid by the promisor to promisee in exchange of their promise. This form of dealing took place between two parties after the promises are committed. There are three rules of consideration in contract law: Present Consideration: The consideration that has already passed away with the time is known as present consideration. Past Consideration: The consideration that is provided before formation of contract is known as past consideration. Future Consideration: The consideration that is to be paid by the party in future after the formation of contract is known as future consideration. Past consideration is not a law. Past consideration is the exception to the actual law of consideration. It is the amount of consideration that is to be paid by the party for which promise is done in present. The consideration is provided before the date of promise. It is also known as executed consideration. The contracts without consideration are void. In other words, the court of law never enforces gratuitous agreements and past consideration is a gratuitous agreement. Under such contracts, the amount is paid by the promisee similar to the case of Chappell Co Ltd v. Nestle Co [1960] AC 87, at the request of the promisor and both the parties understand that the act would be remunerated. It is enforceable under English law(Harris, 2015, pp. 45-47). Law for third situation: In the contract law, mistake is defined as an erroneous belief confronted while contracting that the certain facts are true. There are three types of mistakes in contract law: Mutual Mistake: Such type of mistake occurs when the parties have a misunderstanding about the things for which they were making contract. They think/talks about different thing. Common Mistake: This is the mistake committed by both the parties for the same thing. Unilateral Mistake: It is the form of mistake in which one party mistakenly talks about the thing that other party knows about. One party in this contract have the knowledge about true fact. The situation of Common mistake occurs when both the parties in which contract has occurred were innocent and were making similar mistakes for understanding the fact about the subject matter(inbrief, 2016). As a remedy of common mistake, the parties either breach the contract through mutual consensus or they can rectify their mistakes through applying for the written document rectified. But it is necessary that both the parties should agree over the subject matter of contract. Under the law of common mistake, the subject matter does not exist for longer (Res extinct) and goods were already belongs to purchaser (Res sua). In such cases contracts proves to void because both the parties in this case are innocent. A kind of relief is provided to both the parties by recognizing that such mistake occurs occasionally(Capper, 2009, pp. 459-461). Law for fourth situation: Doctrine of Promissory Estoppels is the contract in which a man is bounded by a promise even when the promise is quite gratuitous. It falls in the spheres that are neither a contract nor an Estoppel. Doctrine of Estoppels allows the person to negate and deny from anything that is constituted as actual truth, either by his deeds or actions that is the represented by the acts of judicial. It enables the person to enforce the actual promises even after the non-payment of consideration. Estoppel is the common name given to the function of legal doctrines. This situation prevents the person from making any assertions as in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 that proves to be contradictory in comparison to the prior situation. In such case, the person is called as estopped. In this case, the estoppels are plugged over the situation to place the brake. This will save the situation to become imbalanced. Application Application for first situation: The contract taken place between Steve and Tom cannot be proved as voidable. Misrepresentation is a civil offense; therefore it is the liability of Steve to pay for the losses of Tom amounted $5000. But Steve is innocent in this case because he has hired his truck innocently and was not aware about the actual capacity of his truck. Another thing that is essential in contract is to return the amount that is paid by the Tom for using the asset of Steve. Application for second situation: In the present case, Steve has promised to Pamela that he would lend his car as she is going on holidays. It is the remuneration that Steve is going to pay to Pamela as she has watered his garden when he was not present at his home. One party in this contract has committed his act on the part that other party will also commit his promise but another party (Steve) has failed to perform his duty. It is a situation where promisee is already bounded with the terms of contractual obligations. Application for third situation: In this situation, Steve has called Danny for the hiring of his car in return of some amount. They both were agreed on similar contract. At the time of contract, both of them was innocent and were unknown about the actual situation. But when Danny has arrived to take the car, Steve said that the car is already destroyed by some of his customer. Both the parties were innocent in this contract, therefore contract can be said to be void. Application for fourth situation: In this case, Steve has mistakenly signed the form that contains specification for air conditioner. He has unknowingly faxed the form to Trisha. When the order has arrived, he has refused to accept it by saying that he has not agreed on this agreement. This has caused losses of several thousand dollars to Trisha. Both the parties are innocent in this case at their positions. Steve was estopped in this case by denying the fact that he had never entered into the contract(Weitzenbck, 2012, pp. 5-9). Conclusion As a conclusion of first case, Tom can rescind the term of contract. The term of contract contains negligence on the part of preparatory. From the point of view of Tom, it is a serious offence rather than innocent misrepresentation. It has its own set of remedies that is separate from the part of negligence. In the second case, because the promise that is enforced is not a part of original contract, thus consideration cannot be claimed for additional contract. Since, no additional consideration is provided for the additional promise; therefore there is no contractual liability for the collection of car. In the third case, the final conclusion can be derived from the case that contract is void according to law on the ground of mistake. The contract will be rescinded by the court as both the parties were failed to perform the contract. In the case of Doctrine of Estoppels, Trisha has innocently believed the fact to be true; therefore she has the right to claim for the amount of conside ration. She will be able to enforce her rights against Steve for the losses. Bibliography Journals Gergen, M. P. (2013). Negligent Misrepresentation as Contract. California Law Review , 101 (04), 953-1011. Websites (2016). Actionable misrepresentation and negligent misstatementoverview. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from lexisnexis: https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/disputeresolution/document/393747/567M-26H1-F18B-71BK-00000-00/Actionable-misrepresentation%E2%80%94overview (2016). Common Law Mistake in Contract. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from inbrief: https://www.inbrief.co.uk/contract-law/mistakes-in-contracts/ Modules Weitzenbck, E. M. (2012). English Law of Contract:Promissory Estoppel. Norwegian Research Center for Computers Law. Harris, B. (2015). Business and Corporations Law. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia: Division of Learning and Teaching Services, Charles Sturt University. Capper, D. (2009). COMMON MISTAKE IN CONTRACT LAW. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies , 457-473.